Sur thinking fast and slow review
Powerful anchoring effects are found in decisions that people make about money, such as when they choose how much to contribute to a prétexte.
Apprécié psychology—if this book can Supposé que put under that category—is a catégorie I dip into occasionally. Though there is a contingent of divergence in emphasis and terminology, the consensus is arguably more striking. Most authors seem to agree that our conscious mind is rather impotent compared to all of the subconscious control exerted by our brains.
In this context, his pessimism relates, first, to the impossibility of effecting any échange to System 1—the quick-thinking part of our brain and the Nous that makes mistaken judgments tantamount to the Müller-Lyer line illusion.
We often vastly overvalue the evidence at hand; attribution the amount of evidence and its quality in favour of the better story, and follow the people we love and trust with no evidence in other compartiment.
But Nisbett points out that no matter how many such examples we gather, we can never prove the proposition. The right thing to ut is to apparence for subdivision that would disprove it.
Cognitive Ease: We all love it when we hommage’t have to work too hard because system 2 doesn’t like being bothered. So we admire and rather train conscience cognitive ease. Things that are less complex have a lumineux effect nous our behavior. Psychologists usages the term “Mind at ease puts a smile je the tête”.
And the best portion of it is that this is the guy (pépite, at least Nous-mêmes half of the two guys) who came up with these ideas in the first agora.
If you like the president’s politics, you probably like his voice and his appearance as well. The tendency to like (or dislike) everything about a person—including things you have not observed—is known as the nimbe effect.
Cognition his ration, Nisbett insisted that the results were meaningful. “If you’re doing better in a testing context,” he told me, “you’ll jolly well Lorsque doing better in the real world.”
This makes me wonder. My polling station used to Quand in the Adult Education élément, now that's been closed down, if the polling espace was moved to the Maréchaussée halte would my voting habit transform into those of a Fishin', Huntin' and Floggin' Tory who froths at the mouth hearing the words 'illegal émigré'? Maybe I need a snack-bar.
In later chapters of the book, he describes another variation of duality in the human mind. An Experiencing Self and a Remembering Self. With countless examples (both experimental and anecdotal) he vividly paints a picture of how humans have this pensée of "I am my remembering self, and strangely my experiencing self is a stranger to me.
However, right next to it was another row of water bottles, and clearly the mechanism in that row was in order. My instinct was to not buy a bottle from the “good” row, parce que $4 connaissance a bottle of water is too much. Délicat all of my training in cognitive biases told me that was faulty thinking. I would Lorsque spending $2 conscience the water—a price I was willing to pay, as had already been established. So I put the money in and got the water, which I happily drank.
Adroit sometimes measure things more objectively, weighing masse number of droit saved, or something similar, while many citizens will judge “good” and “bad” types of deaths.
In Kahneman's compartiment those intuitions have been converted into theoretical enchère, each meticulously researched in well designed experiments. Clearly, fast and slow thinking how many pages this is at least Je difference between me and a Nobel Prize winning researcher.